By MICHAEL SLOVANOS
A 10-page report by a NSW man Gary Christian on the prosepcts of a digital ID system for Australia features on its cover an illustration of the 18th century slave trade that Britain official abolished in the Slave Trade Act of 1807.

More than two centuries on from then we are, of course, a more sophisticated society and slavery still remains illegal and in Australia specifically, under our own Modern Slavery Act 2018 and the various Criminal Code Acts of the States and Commonwealth.

But as noted by Gary Christian, “our current Federal Government already has a track-record of coercing
digital ID on company directors, so there is no reason to believe it won’t be eventually forced on everyone.” Labor and the so-called Opposition also recent voted in significant digital-ID enabling legislation.

The Covid operation has already showed us that the major parties and the bureaucracy that runs them, not only do not have the willpower or integrity to stand up against the dictates of the global corporate-government quasi bureaucracy but are willing accomplices in their schemes.

Two notable cases are the so-called eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant hopping off to the World Economic Forum to push a global social media censorship agenda and the former Australian big-shot bureaucrat Jane Halton pushing the global vaccine agenda at the WHO, Event 201 and CEPI (Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness and Innovation).

Christian further notes: “It must be recognised that Digital ID, teamed with Central Bank Digital currency, uniquely puts in place everything needed for a rigid police state and an advent of tyranny, literally at the flick of a switch. The 20th Century has seen too many governments succumb to totalitarian control, so the stakes are immeasurably high on this issue.”

Christian’s key proposal is for a referendum on this issue, given that it is essentially a Constitutional issue.
“So high are the stakes, in fact, that any possibility of loss of citizen freedoms and rights makes it a
Constitutional issue, where only a Referendum gauging the will of the people on this issue could suffice,” he says.

“Digital ID, as proposed by its chief advocates at the World Economic Forum (WEF), will be the future key to unlock government and private sector services essential to life in Western society – healthcare, banking/financial services, international travel, government services, e-commerce and even social media.

“The WEF even promotes the benefit of a credit card already calibrated to deny payment on purchases of meat once a predetermined carbon footprint max has been reached.”

Christian clearly elucidates the threat posed by enforced digital ID: “Digital identities are given automated access to systems and services, which also means that access can be automatically denied.

“Because all Australians can be coerced by government into adopting Digital ID, teamed with
Central Bank Digital Currency and legislations to move to a cashless society, the crucial elements for a police state are available to any government that wants to change their mind about Consitutional freedoms.

“In the wrong hands digital identities thereby represent an existential threat to Western civilisation as
we know it.”

Christian’s call for a referendum is reasonable and practical. However it will require some sort of coordinated effort by various political parties, including those politicians in the major parties who have the gumption to stand up to cabinet room dictates.

Christan also notes that our Federal Government has failed to opt out of the World Health Organisation’s proposed new health regulations. We can say with cetainty that Albanese and Dutton’s faceless, gutless and compliant advisers are on WEF/UN/WHO and global corporate strings – especially the latter.

“Our Australian government has been working in secret with the World Health Organisation to
mandate such failed vaccines in the future. The WHO’s proposed new Health Regulations:
● remove all informed consent for medical treatment
● remove any the right to choose a treatment
● remove the right to refuse a treatment, particularly
if it is untested and experimental
● remove the right to protect one’s own children
● remove the right to privacy regarding one’s health-related data
● remove the right to be with family and friends
● remove the right to freely travel if well
● remove freedom of speech and opinion by
instituting censorship regimes”

Further on, Christian goes into detail about the role of the WEF in the digitalisation agenda. As we have noted in the past, our own eCommissioner has taken it upon herself to trot off to WEF meetings and spout her totalitarian tendencies and plans to impose a global digital censorship system.

“The world’s chief exponent and advocate for Digital ID has been the World Economic Forum, a body
comprising 3,000 or so of the world’s richest men and women. It promotes the ID2020 organisation. The
World Economic Forum (WEF) self-identifies as having a political philosophy commonly called Globalist.

“They also identify as establishing a New World Order, although this term, commonly used at the end of the twentieth century, is used sparingly today. In their publication “How digital identity can improve
lives in a post-COVID-19 world” the Forum displays a graphic of their vision for Digital ID, where it is perceived as the futuristic key to unlock most every facet of life’s necessities – healthcare, banking/financial services, international travel, government services, e-commerce and even social media.

“It is abundantly clear that if Digital ID becomes the key that unlocks the basic necessities of Western living, non-adopters can conversely be locked out of the above by the stroke of a pen by any player that regulates or operates these entities. Exclusion from daily life and commerce would conceivably act as incentive for speedy adoption.”

Gary Christian’s online paper can be seen at this link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1-c5E4Wc1rBAQwqUG-xQ_cU8059M2eR72/view