TWO more councils have joined with Port Hedland Council in alerting the country to a contamination scandal involving the highly dangerous mRNA gene therapy injections, misleadingly labeled vaccines.

West Tamar Council in northern Tasmania and Ceduna Council in South Australia have decided to back the call by Port Hedland Town Council for the government to withdraw the COVID-19 mRNA “vaccines” that researchers have found contaminated with residual DNA, which can integrate into human DNA and potentially cause cancer.

The Federal Government’s Therapeutic Goods Administration has branded the claims as “misinformation”. Port Hedland Council sent letters to all other Australian local governments to warn them about the contamination issue.

As Cairns News reported a few days ago, the issue will be highlighted in a forum in Perth this Friday titled Hedland Town Council versus the Premier – a reference to WA Premier Roger Cook who insulted councillors, saying they should go back to knitting after making the contamination issue public.

The TGA has issued a statement “reassuring” the public that all COVID-19 vaccines approved in Australia “have been rigorously assessed and meet our high standards for safety, quality, and efficacy” – a claim that has been rejected by senators who have questioned TGA officials.

Senator Gerard Rennick has accused former TGA chief Professor John Skerritt of misleading the Senate over the cause of death involving a boy who received an mRNA injection.

The TGA claims the reports of the risks as claimed by Port Hedland “are based on studies that currently fall short of the scientific rigour expected in pharmaceutical testing and are contributing to the spread of vaccine misinformation”.

However, one of the West Tamar councillors, Dr Julie Sladden, a retired doctor who proposed the council’s motion that was carried five to four, accused the TGA of shutting down scrutiny and debate. Dr Sladden said her motion was about ‘the potential health risks’ and was not stating outright that the vaccines were dangerous. 

“It really isn’t about hanging your hat on a particular verdict but telling people that we are aware it is a concern and we are committed to transparency,’ she told the Daily Mail Australia. “I am very open to having my mind changed if someone can present me the information that is available. Open scientific discourse is what we need. There’s been enough censorship, there’s been enough name-calling.”

Up to 150 people supporting Dr Sladden overflowed from the council chamber into the corridor when the council debated the motion. Some of the group including several doctors, an former church pastor, allied health workers and several vaccine-injured people told their stories to the councillors.

Ceduna Council voted last Wednesday to formally acknowledge the evidence and safety concerns raised in the Port Hedland motion. They also voted to send warning letters to all health practitioners and also write to state and federal officials to express support for Port Hedland Council’s letters.